Because if you have a defacto monopoly – with just a couple of weak competing products, which are already on Google’s “most-wanted” list (yeah, Firefox or “Opera” included) – you should be long timed worrying about the future.Īnd no matter if Google fan or not, this facts should not be ignored. So, Google is right now the most destructive and devious company inside the open market. Rather simple, give the competition “helpful advise and valuable knowledge” – then look how they deconstruct themselves, alienate their own target group, and when they have become to weak because the competition was not interested in thinking twice or only thinking with the open money purse – they will be taken over by Google… Or vanish on their own. The main goal of the Google crowd is to make others weak so they can take over seen long-term wise. Pale Moon isn’t for thornton but only Google is so heavily interested to utterly destroy their competition. You’re a mainstream user so you stick to your mainstream software that isn’t “outdated” and does things like every other mainstream product because when they all do it the same way that means it’s better. I don’t either, but I’m not making claims about how one is better than the other. Whether or not multi-process is the way to go is a technical question that you don’t have the technical knowledge to discuss in any depth. People often make their way to the forum and want Pale Moon to be Firefox in one way or another and those people would be better off using Firefox. Who knows how many other things you might have come up with that it can’t do that it actually can. So out of the two things Pale Moon can’t do that you mentioned, it can actually do one of them. If that’s too complex and you absolutely have to use the new interface, Pale Moon isn’t for you. You have to change the user agent override to get it to work, but it does work. All the credit card flags are – Pale Moon does work on YouTube’s new layout. It never gets to where the user feels in control. I do have many, many config settings changed in FF but chrome is very limited flags that can be altered only take it from onerously nagging to annoying. Sessions in even the older woolyss versions would go for just so long before it was obvious you were being tracked because of captchas suddenly appearing, redirects or other odd behavior I never get in FF. In google’s paraphrased wording, chrome is browser based user advertising data collection software, so don’t expect much. WebRTC is so entwined in chromium (and chrome) it’s not feasible to disable it, so new woolyss versions don’t disable it. Privacy was the intention of woolyss chromium. That’s what I use when I have to use chrome the only almost private flavor of chromium. You could try woolyss chromium, there are versions with no webRTC or sync still available, last one for Win 64 bit is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |